Purpose/Objectives: To examine patient preferences for content and methods of delivering treatment plans, educational information, and survivorship care plans.
Research Approach: Thematic analysis of four tape-recorded focus groups of cancer survivors.
Setting: An outpatient clinical cancer center in an academic medical center in the midwestern United States.
Participants: 40 cancer survivors who had completed initial treatment. Participants were grouped by disease site: (a) prostate, genitourinary, and skin; (b) breast and gynecologic; (c) gastrointestinal, sarcoma, and head and neck; and (d) brain, pancreas, and lung.
Methodologic Approach: An exploratory, descriptive approach with in-depth focus group thematic and comparative analysis methodology. The data are grouped into four major, interconnected themes.
Main Research Variables: Survivors' personal experiences with receiving cancer treatment.
Findings: Four categories were agreed on using thematic analysis: educational information, treatment plan, survivorship care plan, and patient support. Themes were identified within each category.
Conclusions: The number of cancer survivors continues to grow each year. Approaching each survivor with individualized educational information, an initial treatment plan, a survivorship care plan, and emotional support is imperative. Oncology nurses must assess cancer survivors for their unique needs and intervene accordingly.
Interpretation: Because oncology nurses assess and recognize the learning needs of each patient, they are best positioned to develop teaching content, strategies, and timing of interventions. The importance of written educational materials cannot be negated. Oncology nurses also are well positioned to provide a proactive role in the development and delivery of treatment and survivorship plans of care.
References
American Cancer Society. (2010). Cancer facts and figures 2010. Atlanta, GA: Author.
Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 1-11.
Haylock, P. J., Mitchell, S. A., Cox, T., Temple, S. V., & Curtiss, C. P. (2007). The cancer survivor's prescription for living: Nurses must take the lead in planning care for survivors. American Journal of Nursing, 107(4), 58-70.
Hewitt, M., Greenfield, S., & Stovall, E. (Eds.) (2006). From cancer patient to cancer survivor: Lost in transition. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Jacobs, L. A., Palmer, S. C., Schwartz, L. A., DeMichele, A., Mao, J. J., Carver, J., … Meadows, A. T. (2009). Adult cancer survivorship: Evolution, research, and planning care.
CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 59, 391-410.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3322/caac.20040
Jersild, S. (2007). Programs work toward transitioning survivors to primary care. ONCOLOGY: Nurse Edition, 21(4, Suppl.), 40-?43.
Morgan, M. A. (2009). Cancer survivorship: History, quality-of-life issues, and the evolving multidisciplinary approach to implementation of cancer survivorship care plans.
Oncology Nursing Forum, 36, 429-436.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1188/09.ONF.429-436
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2003). Nursing research: Principles and methods (7th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
Schlairet, M., Heddon, M. A., & Griffis, M. (2010). Piloting a needs assessment to guide development of a survivorship program for a community cancer center.
Oncology Nursing Forum, 37, 501-508.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1188/10.ONF.501-508
Shulman, L. N., Jacobs, L. A., Greenfield, S., Jones, B., McCabe, M. S., Syrjala, K., … Ganz, P. A. (2009). Cancer care and cancer survivorship care in the United States: Will we be able to care for these patients in the future?
Journal of Oncology Practice, 5, 119-123.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JOP.0932001