Eighteen Sensations After Breast Cancer Surgery: A Comparison of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Axillary Lymph Node Dissection

Roberta H. Baron

Jane V. Fey

Sara Raboy

Howard T. Thaler

Patrick I. Borgen

Larissa K. F. Temple

Kimberly J. Van Zee

ONF 2002, 29(4), 651-659. DOI: 10.1188/02.ONF.651-659

Purpose/Objectives: To evaluate prevalence, severity, and level of distress of 18 sensations at 3-15 days (baseline), 3 months, and 6 months after breast cancer surgery; to compare sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) to SLNB with immediate or delayed axillary lymph node dissection; to evaluate the Breast Sensation Assessment Scale© (BSAS©) for reliability and validity.

Design: Prospective, descriptive.

Setting: Evelyn H. Lauder Ambulatory Breast Center at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York City.

Sample: 283 women with breast cancer; 187 had SLNB, and 96 had SLNB and axillary lymph node dissection.

Methods: Patients completed the BSAS© at baseline, three months, and six months after surgery.

Main Research Variables: Prevalence, severity, and level of distress of sensations in patients who had breast cancer surgery.

Findings: Sensations were less prevalent, severe, and distressing following SLNB compared with axillary lymph node dissection at all three time points. Tenderness and soreness remained highly prevalent following SLNB at the three time points. Tenderness, soreness, tightness, and numbness were among the most severe and distressing symptoms in both groups. The BSAS© demonstrated good reliability and validity.

Conclusions: Overall prevalence, severity, and level of distress were lower following SLNB compared with axillary lymph node dissection at baseline, three months, and six months after surgery. Certain sensations remained prevalent, severe, and distressing in both groups. The BSAS© is a reliable and valid instrument.

Implications for Nursing: Nurses should be familiar with prevalent sensations patients experience after SLNB and axillary lymph node dissection so they can provide education and support.

Jump to a section

    References

    Aday, L.A. (1996). Designing and conducting health surveys: A comprehensive guide (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Albertini, J.J., Lyman, G.H., Cox, C., Yeatman, T., Balducci, L., Ku, N., et al. (1996). Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in the patient with breast cancer. JAMA, 276, 1818-1822.

    Baron, R.H., Frankel-Kelvin, J., Bookbinder, M., Cramer, L., Borgen, P.I., & Thaler, H.T. (2000). Patients' sensations after breast cancer surgery. Cancer Practice, 8, 215-222.

    Giuliano, A.E., Jones, R.C., Brennan, M., & Statman, R. (1997). Sentinel lym-phadenectomy in breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 15, 2345-2350.

    Hill, A., Tran, K.N., Akhurst, T., Yeung, H., Yeh, S., Rosen, P.P., et al. (1999). Lessons learned from 500 cases of lymphatic mapping for breast cancer. Annals of Surgery, 229, 528-535.

    Johnson, J.E. (1972). Effects of structuring patients' expectations on their reactions to threatening events. Nursing Research, 21, 499-503.

    Johnson, J.E. (1996). Coping with radiation therapy: Optimism and the effect of preparatory interventions. Research in Nursing and Health, 19(1), 3-12.

    Kroner, K., Knudsen, U.B., Lundby, L., & Hvid, H. (1992). Long-term phantom breast syndrome after mastectomy. Clinical Journal of Pain, 8, 346-350.

    Kroner, K., Krebs, B., Skov, J., & Jorgensen, H.S. (1989). Immediate and long-term phantom breast syndrome after mastectomy: Incidence, clinical characteristics, and relationship to pre-mastectomy breast pain. Pain, 6, 327-334.

    Maunsell, E., Brisson, J., & Deschenes, L. (1993). Arm problems and psychological distress after surgery for breast cancer. Canadian Journal of Surgery, 36, 315-320.

    McDowell, I., & Newell, C. (1996). Measuring health: A guide to rating scales and questionnaires (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    McHugh, N.G., Christman, N.J., & Johnson, J.E. (1982). Preparatory information: What helps and why. American Journal of Nursing, 82, 780-782.

    Morton, D.L., Wen, D.R., Wong, J.H., Economou, J.S., Cagle, L.A., Storm, F.K., et al. (1992). Technical details of intraoperative lymphatic mapping for early stage melanoma. Archives of Surgery, 127, 392-399.

    Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    O'Hea, B.J., Hill, A., El-Shirbiny, A.M., Yeh, S., Rosen, P.P., Coit, D.G., et al. (1998). Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: Initial experience at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 186, 423-427.

    Salant, P., & Dillman, D.A. (1994). How to conduct your own survey. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Schrenk, P., Rieger, R., Shamiyeh, A., & Wayand, W. (2000). Morbidity following sentinel lymph node biopsy versus axillary lymph node dissection for patients with breast carcinoma. Cancer, 88, 608-614.

    Swenson, K.K., Nissen, M., Ceronsky, C.L., & Tuttle, T.M. (2001, February). Comparison of side effects between sentinel lymph node and axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer [Abstract]. Presented at the American Cancer Society 6th National Conference on Cancer Nursing Research, Ponte Vedra Beach, FL.

    Tasmuth, T., von Smitten, K., Hietanen, P., Kataja, M., & Kalso, E. (1995). Pain and other symptoms after different treatment modalities of breast cancer. Annals of Oncology, 6, 453-459.

    Veronesi, U., Pagnelli, G., Galimberti, V., Viale, G., Zurrida, S., Bedoni, M., et al. (1997). Sentinel node biopsy to avoid axillary dissection in breast cancer with clinically negative lymph nodes. Lancet, 349, 1864-1867.