Article

Patients' Attitudes Toward Internet Cancer Support Groups

Eun-Ok Im

Wonshik Chee

Hyun Ju Lim

Yi Liu

Enrique Guevara

Kyung Suk Kim

Internet, support group, attitudes
ONF 2007, 34(3), 705-712. DOI: 10.1188/07.ONF.705-712

Purpose/Objectives: To explore patients' attitudes toward Internet cancer support groups (ICSGs) through an online forum.

Research Approach: Qualitative study using a feminist perspective.

Setting: Internet and real settings.

Participants: 16 patients with cancer.

Methodologic Approach: An online forum was held for one month with six discussion topics. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis.

Main Research Variables: Attitudes toward ICSGs.

Findings: Through the data-analysis process, four themes were found related to patients' attitudes toward ICSGs. First, the participants universalized patients' needs for and attitudes toward ICSGs. Second, most of the participants wanted to use ICSGs for emotional support, information, and interactions. Third, many of the participants used ICSGs because they could reach out to other patients with cancer without traveling and without interrupting their busy schedules. Finally, many participants were concerned about the security of interactions on ICSGs, so they wanted ICSGs that could ensure privacy and safeguard the anonymity and confidentiality of what they shared online.

Conclusions: Patients view ICSGs positively. Additional studies should examine gender-specific and multilanguage ICSGs by recruiting more ethnic minority patients.

Interpretation: Despite concerns about the security of Internet interactions, ICSGs would be an excellent source of social support that is acceptable to patients with cancer.

Jump to a section

    References

    Andrist, L.C., & MacPherson, K.I. (2001). Conceptual models for women's health research: Reclaiming menopause as an exemplar of nursing's contributions to feminist scholarship. Annual Review of Nursing Research, 19, 29-60.
    Bassett, C. (1997). Virtually gendered: Life in an on-line world. In K. Gelder & S. Thorton (Eds.), The subcultures reader (pp. 537-550). London: Routledge.
    Bell, D., & Kennedy, B. (2000). The cybercultures reader. London: Routledge.
    Boyatzis, R.E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Campbell, M.K., Meier, A., & Carr, C. (2001). Health behavior changes after colon cancer: A comparison of findings from face-to-face and on-line focus groups. Family and Community Health, 24(3), 88-103.
    Cartwright, L. (2000). Reach out and heal someone: Telemedicine and the globalization of health care. Health, 4, 347-377.
    Classen, C., Butler, L.C., Koopman, C., Miller, E., DiMiceli, S., Giese-Davis, J., et al. (2001). Supportive-expressive group therapy and distress in patients with metastatic breast cancer: A randomized clinical intervention trial. Archives of General Psychiatry, 58, 494-501.
    Cline, R.J.W., & Haynes, K.M. (2001). Consumer health information seeking on the Internet: The state of the art. Health Education Research, 16, 671-692.
    Diefenbach, M.A., Dorsey, J., Uzzo, R.G., Hanks, G.E., Greenberg, R.E., Horwitz, E., et al. (2002). Decision-making strategies for patients with localized prostate cancer. Seminars in Urologic Oncology, 20, 55-62.
    Featherstone, M. (2000). Post-bodies: What does this mean? Aging, and virtual reality. In D. Bell & B. Kennedy (Eds.), The cybercultures reader (pp. 609-618). London: Routledge.
    Fernsler, J.I., & Manchester, L.J. (1997). Evaluation of a computer-based cancer support network. Cancer Practice, 5, 46-51.
    Fogel, J., Albert, S.M., Schabel, F., Ditkoff, B.A., & Neugut, A.I. (2002a). Internet use and social support in women with breast cancer. Health Psychology, 21, 398-404.
    Fogel, J., Albert, S.M., Schabel, F., Ditkoff, B.A., & Neugut, A.I. (2002b). Use of the Internet by women with breast cancer. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 4(2), E9.
    Fogel, J., Albert, S.M., Schabel, F., Ditkoff, B.A., & Neugut, A.I. (2003). Racial/ethnic differences and potential psychological benefits in use of the Internet by women with breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 12, 107-117.
    Ford-Gilboe, M., & Campbell, J. (1996). The mother-headed single-parent family: A feminist critique of the nursing literature. Nursing Outlook, 44, 173-183.
    Gustafson, D., Wise, M., McTavish, F., & Taylor, J.O. (1993). Development and pivotal evaluation of a computer-based support system for women with breast cancer. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 11, 69-93.
    Gustafson, D.H., Hawkins, R., Pingree, S., McTavish, F., & Arora, N. (2001). Effect of computer support on younger women with breast cancer. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16, 435-445.
    Hall, J.M., & Stevens, P.E. (1991). Rigor in feminist research. Advances in Nursing Science, 13, 16-29.
    Hegelson, V.S., Cohen, S., Schulx, R., & Yasko, J. (1999). Education and peer discussion group interventions and adjustment to breast cancer. Archives of General Psychiatry, 56, 340-347.
    Houston, T.K., Cooper, L.A., & Ford, D.E. (2002). Internet support groups for depression: A 1-year prospective cohort study. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 2062-2068.
    Im, E., Chee, W., Guevara, E., Lim, H., Liu, Y., & Shin, H. (in press). Gender and ethnic differences in cancer patients' needs for help: An Internet survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies.
    Kendall, L. (1998). Meanings and identity in ‘cyberspace’: The performance of gender, class, and race online. Symbolic Interaction, 21, 129-154.
    Klemm, P., & Hardie, T. (2002). Depression in Internet and face-to-face cancer support groups: A pilot study [Online exclusive]. Oncology Nursing Forum, 29, E45-E51. Retrieved April 18, 2007, from http://www.ons.org/publications/journals/ONF/Volume29/Issue4/pdf/45.pdf
    Klemm, P., Hurst, M., Dearholt, S.L., & Trone, S.R. (1999). Gender differences on Internet cancer support groups. Computers in Nursing, 17, 65-72.
    Klemm, P., Reppert, K., & Visich, L. (1998). A nontraditional cancer support group. Computers in Nursing, 16, 31-36.
    Leary, T. (2000). The cyberpunk: The individual as reality pilot. In D. Bell & B. Kennedy (Eds.), The cybercultures reader (pp. 529-539). London: Routledge.
    Lieberman, M.A., Golant, M., & Giese-Davis, J. (2003). Electronic support groups for breast carcinoma: A clinical trial of effectiveness. Cancer, 97, 920-925.
    Luborsky, M.R. (1993). The identification and analysis of themes and patterns. In J.F. Gubrium & A. Sankar (Eds.), Qualitative methods in aging research (pp. 189-210). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Magen, R.H., & Glajchen, M. (1999). Cancer support groups: Client outcome and the context of group process. Research on Social Work Practice, 9, 541-554.
    McTavish, F.M., Gustafson, D.H., & Owens, B.H. (1995). CHESS: An interactive computer system for women with breast cancer piloted with an underserved population. Journal of Ambulatory Care Management, 18, 35-41.
    Mead, N., Varnam, R., Rogers, A., & Roland, M. (2003). What predicts patients' interest in the Internet as a health resource in primary care in England? Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 8, 33-39.
    Michalec, B., Willigen, M.V., Wilson, K., Schreier, A., & Williams, S. (2004). The race gap in support group participation by breast cancer survivors. Evaluation Review, 28, 123-143.
    Mills, M.E., & Davidson, R. (2002). Cancer patients' sources of information: Use and quality issues. Psycho-Oncology, 11, 371-378.
    Pautler, S.E., Tan, J.K., Dugas, G.R., Pus, N., Ferri, M., Hardie, W.R., et al. (2001). Use of the Internet for self-education by patients with prostate cancer. Urology, 57, 230-233.
    Pereira, J.L., Koski, S., Hanson, J., Bruera, E.D., & Mackey, J.R. (2000). Internet usage among women with breast cancer: An exploratory study. Clinical Breast Cancer, 1, 148-153.
    Pew Internet and American Life Project. (2000). Reports: Demographics. Older Americans and the Internet. Retrieved September 18, 2005, from http://www.pewInternet.org/PPF/r/117/report_display.asp
    Pitts, V. (2004). Illness and Internet empowerment: Writing and reading breast cancer in cyberspace. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine, 8, 33-59.
    Plant, S. (2000). On the matrix: Cyberfeminist simulations. In D. Bell & B. Kennedy (Eds.), The cybercultures reader (pp. 325-336). London: Routledge.
    Raupach, J.C.A., & Hiller, J.E. (2002). Information and support for women following the primary treatment of breast cancer. Health Expectations, 5, 289-301.
    Sardar, Z. (2000). Alt.civilizations. FAQ: Cyberspace as the darker side of the West. In D. Bell & B. Kennedy (Eds.), The cybercultures reader (pp. 732-752). London: Routledge.
    Satterlund, M.J., McCaul, K.D., & Sandgren, A.K. (2003). Information gathering over time by breast cancer patients. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 5(3), E15. Retrieved April 18, 2007, from http://www.jmir.org/2003/3/e15
    Sharf, B.F. (1997). Communicating breast cancer on-line: Support and empowerment on the Internet. Women and Health, 26, 65-84.
    Stevens, P.E. (1996). Focus groups: Collecting aggregate-level data to understand community health phenomena. Public Health Nursing, 13, 170-176.
    Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York: Simon and Schuster.
    Waskul, D., Douglass, M., & Edgley, C. (2000). Cybersex: Outercourse and the enselfment of the body. Symbolic Interaction, 23, 375-398.
    Weinberg, N., Schmale, J., Uken, J., & Wessel, K. (1996). Online help: Cancer patients participate in a computer-mediated support group. Health and Social Work, 21, 24-29.
    Winzelberg, A.J., Classen, C., & Alpers, G.W. (2003). Evaluation of an Internet support group for women with primary breast cancer. Cancer, 97, 1164-1173.
    Ziebland, S., Chapple, A., Dumelow, C., Evans, J., Prinijha, S., & Rozmovits, L. (2004). How the Internet affects patients' experience of cancer: A qualitative study. BMJ, 328, 564.