Article

Understanding the Meaning of Social Well-Being at the End of Life

Maryjo Prince-Paul

end-of-life care, psychosocial support systems, quality of life
ONF 2008, 35(3), 365-371. DOI: 10.1188/08.ONF.365-371

Purpose/Objectives: To advance understanding of the social well-being domain, a dimension of quality of life, from the perspective of dying individuals.

Research Approach: Qualitative, hermeneutic, and phenomenologic.

Setting: Private residences in a community setting.

Participants: 8 terminally ill adult patients with cancer, aged 35-75, enrolled in hospice care.

Methodologic Approach: In-depth, semistructured, tape-recorded, and transcribed interviews were analyzed using the Giorgi method.

Main Research Variables: Social well-being and quality of life at the end of life.

Findings: Six themes emerged that described the meaning of close personal relationships at the end of life: meaning of relationships with family, friends, and coworkers; meaning of relationships with God or a higher power; loss and gains of role function; love; gratitude; and lessons on living.

Conclusions: Patients who were terminally ill with advanced cancer expressed the importance of close personal relationships at the end of life and the need to communicate their importance through love and gratitude. All participants believed that personal relationships were strengthened by the end-of-life experience.

Interpretation: Nurses can support terminally ill patients by understanding the importance of social relationships at the end of life. The relationships may be enhanced when nurses raise patients' conscious awareness of the relationships and encourage them to express their importance.

Jump to a section

    References

    Altman, I., & Taylor, D. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
    Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497-529.
    Berschied, E., & Peplau, L. (1983). The emerging science of relationships. In H. Kelley, E. Berschied, A. Christensen, J. Harvey, T. Hustun, G. Levinger, et al. (Eds.), Close relationships (pp. 1-20). New York: Freeman.
    Block, S. (2001). Psychological considerations, growth, and transcendence at the end of life: The art of the possible. JAMA, 285(22), 2898-2905.
    Bowlby, J. (1979). The making and breaking of affectional bonds. London: Tavistock.
    Byock, I. (1996). The nature of suffering and the nature of opportunity at the end of life. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine, 12(2), 237-252.
    Byock, I. (1997). Dying well: The prospect for growth at the end of life. New York: Riverhead Books.
    Byock, I., & Merriman, M. (1998). Measuring quality of life for patients with terminal illness: The Missoula-VITAS Quality-of-Life Index. Palliative Medicine, 12(4), 231-244.
    Churchill, S., Lowery, J., McNally, O., & Rao, A. (1998). The question of reliability in interpretive psychological research: A comparison of three phenomenologically based protocol analyses. In R. Valle (Ed.), Phenomenological inquiry in psychology: Existential and transpersonal dimensions (pp. 63-86). New York: Plenum Press.
    Cobb, M. (2001). The dying soul: Spiritual care at the end of life. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
    Cohen, S. R., Mount, B., Strobel, M., & Bui, F. (1995). The McGill Quality-of-Life Questionnaire: A measure of quality of life appropriate for people with advanced disease. A preliminary study of validity and acceptability. Palliative Medicine, 9(3), 207-219.
    Coyle, N. (2006). The hard work of living in the face of death. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 32(3), 266-274.
    Duck, S. (1988). Relating to others. Milton Keynes, England: Open University Press.
    Ferrell, B. R., Grant, M., Funk, B., Otis-Green, S., & Garcia, N. (1997). Quality of life in breast cancer. Part I: Physical and social well-being. Cancer Nursing, 20(6), 398-408.
    Fromm, E. (1956). The art of loving. New York: Harper Collins.
    George, L. (2002). Research design in end-of-life research: State of the science. Gerontologist, 42(3), 86-98.
    Giorgi, A. (1971). Phenomenology and experimental psychology. In A. Giorgi, W. Fischer, & V. Eckartsberg (Eds.), Duquesne studies in phenomenological psychology: Volume I (pp. 66-79). Pittsburgh, PA: Dusquesne University Press.
    Greisinger, A., Lorimor, R., Aday, L., Winn, R., & Baile, W. (1997). Terminally ill cancer patients: Their most important concerns. Cancer Practice, 5(3), 147-154.
    Hendrick, S., & Hendrick, C. (2002). Love. In C. Snyder & S. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 472-485). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
    Horney, K. (1945). Our inner conflicts: A constructive theory of neurosis. New York: Norton.
    Kearney, M. (1996). Mortally wounded: Stories of soul pain, death, and healing. New York: Scribner.
    Keeley, M., & Yingling, J. (2007). Final conversations: Helping the living and the dying talk to each other. Acton, MA: VanderWyk and Burham.
    Kelley, H., Berschied, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J., Hustun, T., Levinger, G., et al. (Eds.). (1983). Close relationships. New York: Freeman.
    Kuhl, D. (2002). What dying people want. Practical wisdom for the end of life. New York: Public Affairs.
    Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Maslow, A. (1970). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper.
    McMillan, S., & Weitzner, M. (2000). How problematic are various aspects of quality of life in patients with cancer at the end of life? Oncology Nursing Forum, 27(5), 817-823.
    Mikulincer, M., Florian, V., & Hirschberger, G. (2003). The existential function of close relationships: Introducing death into the science of love. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7(1), 20-40.
    National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care. (2004). Clinical practice guidelines for quality palliative care. Retrieved October 11, 2007, from http://www.nationalconsensusproject.org
    National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization. (2007). NHPCO facts and figures: Hospice care in America. Retrieved October 17, 2007, from http://www.nhpco.org/files/public/Statistics_Research/NHPCO_facts-and-figures_Nov2007.pdf
    National Quality Forum. (2006). National framework and preferred practices for palliative and hospice care. Retrieved October 17, 2007, from http://www.qualityforum.org
    Omery, A. (1983). Phenomenology: A method for nursing research. Advances in Nursing Science, 5(2), 49-63.
    Steinhauser, K. E., Bosworth, H. B., Clipp, E. C., McNeilly, M., Christakis, N. A., Parker, J., et al. (2002). Initial assessment of a new instrument to measure quality of life at the end of life. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 5(6), 829-841.
    Steinhauser, K. E., Christakis, N. A., Clipp, E. C., McNeilly, M., Grambow, S., Parker, J., et al. (2001). Preparing for the end of life: Preferences of patients, families, physicians, and other care providers. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 22(3), 727-737.
    Sullivan, H. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York: Norton.
    Sulmasy, D. P. (2001). At wit's end: Forgiveness, dignity, and the care of the dying. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16(5), 335-338.
    Sulmasy, D. P. (2006). The rebirth of the clinic: An introduction to spirituality in healthcare. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
    Tedlock, D. (1983). The spoken word and work of interpretation. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    Tedlock, D. (1990). From voice and ear to hand and eye. Journal of American Folklore, 103(408), 133-156.
    Van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.