Article

Use of a Speech-Generating Device for Hospitalized Postoperative Patients With Head and Neck Cancer Experiencing Speechlessness

Carmen Rodriguez

Meredeth Rowe

head and neck cancer, head and neck neoplasms, communication
ONF 2010, 37(2), 199-205. DOI: 10.1188/10.ONF.199-205

Purpose/Objectives: To test the feasibility of using a programmable speech-generating device (PSGD) in hospitalized adults with head and neck cancer experiencing speechlessness.

Design: Time-series design.

Setting: Tertiary care institution, inpatient setting.

Sample: 9 female and 12 male postoperative patients (X age = 62 years) experiencing speechlessness as a result of a surgical intervention to treat head and neck cancer.

Methods: Patients participated in a communication intervention that incorporated use of a PSGD during their hospital stay. Data about PSGD use and functionality- and technology-related issues were collected. Satisfaction and usability of the PSGD were rated with the Satisfaction and Usability Instrument.

Main Research Variables: Use of, satisfaction with, and usability of the PSGD.

Findings: Participants demonstrated significant improvement in ability to use the PSGD over a four-day period for all communication functions assessed. Results indicated that participants were "quite satisfied" with using the device and considered the technology to be "quite important" during the postoperative period. PSGD messages generated by participants via the hospital call system were understood by clerks. However, participants admitted to intensive care units experienced issues associated with accessibility of the device.

Conclusions: Participants demonstrated proficient and independent use of the PSGD to communicate programmed messages; however, other strategies were necessary to meet their communication needs as the postoperative period progressed. Additional research on technologic communication options and strategies to tailor technology to meet the needs of speechless patients is warranted.

Implications for Nursing: PSGDs may offer a more reliable option to facilitate communication between patients and nurses during the postoperative period. Technology should be tailored to meet speechless patients' unique needs as they progress through the rehabilitation process.

Jump to a section

    References

    Ashworth, P. M. (1984). Staff-patient communication in coronary care units. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 9, 35-42.
    Costello, J. M. (2000). AAC intervention in the intensive care unit: The children's hospital Boston model. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16, 137-153. doi: 10.1080/07434610012331279004
    Demers, L., Monette, M., Lapierre, Y., Arnold, D. L., & Wolfson, C. (2002). Reliability, validity, and applicability of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0) for adults with multiple sclerosis. Disability and Rehabilitation Journal, 24(1-3), 21-30. doi: 10.1080/09638280110066352
    Demers, L., Wessels, R., Weiss-Lambrow, R., Ska, B., & Witte, L. (1999). An international content validation of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST). Occupational Therapy International Journal, 6, 159-175.
    Happ, M. B. (2000). Interpretation of nonvocal behavior and the meaning of voicelessness in critical care. Social Science and Medicine, 50, 1247-1255. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2003.12.005
    Happ, M. B., Roesch, T. K., & Garrett, K. (2004). Electronic voice-output communication aids for temporarily nonspeaking patients in a medical intensive care unit: A feasibility study. Heart and Lung, 33, 92-101. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2003.12.005
    Happ, M. B., Roesch, T. K., & Kagan, S. H. (2005). Patient communication following head and neck cancer surgery: A pilot study using electronic speech-generating devices. Oncology Nursing Forum, 32, 1179-1187. doi: 10.1188/05.ONF.1179-1187
    Patak, L., Gawlinski, A., Fung, N. I., Doering, L., & Berg, J. (2004). Patients' reports of healthcare practitioner interventions that are related to communication during mechanical ventilation. Heart and Lung, 33, 308-320. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2004.02.002
    Rodriguez, C. S. (2003). Pain measurement in elderly head and neck cancer patients with communication impairments. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida.
    Stovsky, B., Rudy, E., & Dragonette, P. (1988). Comparison of two types of communication methods used after cardiac surgery with patients with endotracheal tubes. Heart and Lung, 17, 281-289.