Barclay, J., Vestey, J., Lambert, A., & Balmer, C. (2006). Reducing the symptoms of lymphoedema: Is there a role for aromatherapy? European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 10(2), 140–149.

DOI Link

Study Purpose

To assess the effectiveness of self-massage and skin care using a base cream containing aromatherapy oils versus using a base cream without aromatherapy oils in terms of objective reduction in limb volume and patient-reported symptom improvement and well-being after simple lymphatic drainage

Sample Characteristics

  • The sample (N = 81) was comprised of patients who were randomized to either the experimental group (n = 40) or the control group (n = 41).
  • The majority of patients were female (n = 77), with only four male patients.
  • Age of the sample ranged from 25–80 years.
  • Patients were included in the study if they
    • Were referred to the Dorset Cancer Centre Lymphedema Service
    • Had lymphedema for more than one year
    • Had bilateral or unilateral stable lymphedema
    • Had no evidence of acute inflammation, thrombosis, or recurrence
    • Agreed to avoid other aromatherapy-based treatments and products during their treatment period
    • Were not pregnant or sensitive to aromatherapy or wheat germ.

Measurement Instruments/Methods

  • Circumference was measured every 4 cm using a self-tensioning tape measure and recorded as absolute volume.
  • Truncated cone calculation was used to calculate volume.
  • Measurements were taken monthly for three months.
  • If no improvement was seen over three months, patients were taken off the trial and returned to standard hospital therapy.
  • Symptom improvement, activity, and well-being were measured using the Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile 2 (MYMOP2).

Results

Self-massage and skin care significantly improved patient-identified symptom relief and well-being for patients. It also, but not significantly, reduced limb volume. Aromatherapy oils did not appear to influence any improvement in these measures. In the experimental group, 69% had limb reduction, compared to 57% in the control group (p = 0.38). Both groups combined showed slight improvement (p = 0.034). The finding supports the use of simple lymphatic drainage. Well-being, pain, discomfort, mobility, and body image were evaluated and showed significant improvement in patient-identified symptom relief and well-being. No difference was observed using aromatherapy.

Limitations

  • Determining the value of subjective benefits was difficult, even using the scale.
  • The study used both primary and secondary patients.
  • The study sample was not a very homogeneous group, presenting too many variables.
  • Patients did not necessarily have a cancer diagnosis.
  • The cause of lymphedema was not defined.