Chang, C.J., & Cormier, J.N. (2013). Lymphedema interventions: Exercise, surgery, and compression devices. Seminars in Oncology Nursing, 29, 28–40.  

DOI Link

Purpose

STUDY PURPOSE: To review the current literature regarding the treatment of lymphedema, providing applications of the evidence to the care of patients with cancer, with or at risk for, lymphedema

TYPE OF STUDY:  General review and semisystematic

Search Strategy

DATABASES USED: 11 major medical indices from 2004–2010
 
KEYWORDS:  Lymphedema, exercise, surgical treatment, excisional procedures, lymphatic reconstruction, tissue transfer, lymphedema management, intermittent pneumatic compression
 
EXCLUSION CRITERIA:  Predefined, not listed in this article

Literature Evaluated

TOTAL REFERENCES RETRIEVED: N = 1,303
EVALUATION METHOD AND COMMENTS ON LITERATURE USED: 659 reviewed by clinical lymphedema experts for inclusion in categories of lymphedema, with exercise and/or surgery

Sample Characteristics

FINAL NUMBER STUDIES INCLUDED =  19 exercise; 20 surgery; 13 IPC
 
TOTAL PATIENTS INCLUDED IN REVIEW:   Approximately 2,554; > 295 exercise, 2,016 surgery, 243 IPC

Phase of Care and Clinical Applications

PHASE OF CARE:  Multiple phases of care

Results

The PAL trial provides the strongest evidence to date that progressive resistive exercises may reduce the risk of, and not exacerbate pre-existing,  BCRL. However, no clear evidence-based recommendation regarding compression garment use during exercise can be made. Surgical treatment is associated with risk, and should not be considered a first line treatment.  IPC devices may play a role in a multi-modality approach.  There are no clear evidence-based guidelines for pressure setting use in lymphedema management.

Conclusions

CDT remains the standard in LE therapy, but there is some limited evidence supporting consideration of adjunctive therapies, such as exercise, surgery, and IPC. More RCTs looking at exercise and LE in populations other than those with breast cancer are needed, especially studies with LE of other areas of body, and role of compression garments during exercise. Surgical treatments are promising in LE not responsive to standard therapy. IPC in low to moderate pressure ranges appear to be a safe adjunctive treatment option for appropriate, selective patients, in conjunction with CDT.

Limitations

  • Exercise studies were limited to BCRL. 
  • Surgical studies need larger cohorts. 
  • Longer follow-up was needed. 
  • IPC studies are needed evaluating cost benefit, as well as specific recommendations, for pressure settings and length of treatments.

Nursing Implications

Patients with LE need education regarding the benefits of exercise in general health and cancer prevention, tailored to their individual needs and comorbidities. Surgery for LE should not be considered a first-line treatment. Microvascular procedures should be treated by experienced surgeons offering ongoing care with support from certified lymphedema providers. IPC is potentially a valuable adjunctive therapy, and should be prescribed only by practitioners trained at a specialist level. With no clear guidelines for use, the authors recommend the current NLN recommendations for pump pressures from 30-60 mmHG. Additional research is essential in these categories to provide evidence based guidelines and safe, effective patient care for patients with lymphedema.

Legacy ID

4042