Zhang, R., Chen, J., Huang, H., Ma, J., Meng, F., Tang, Y., . . . Han, M. (2017). Primary fungal prophylaxis in acute leukemia patients with different risk factors: retrospective analysis from the CAESAR study. International Journal of Hematology, 106, 221-228.

DOI Link

Study Purpose

To identify subgroups of patients undergoing treatment for leukemia who would receive the most benefit from primary antifungal prophylaxis (PAP).

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process

Retrospective subgroup analysis of the observational China Assessment of Antifungal Therapy in Hematological Disease (CAESAR) study. Invasive Fungal Disease (IFD) was defined per the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the NIH/NIAID Mycoses Study Group criteria and classified as possible, probable, and proven. Treatments were categorized as antifungal prophylaxis, empirical treatment, preemptive therapy, and treatment of established IFD.

Sample Characteristics

  • N = 2015   
  • AGE: Median age = 32; range = 1-82
  • MALES: 56%  
  • FEMALES: 44%
  • CURRENT TREATMENT: Chemotherapy
  • KEY DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Patients (all ages) undergoing treatment with chemotherapy for acute leukemia.

Setting

  • SITE: Multi-site   
  • SETTING TYPE: Multiple settings    
  • LOCATION: Multiple hospitals in China; patients with IFD were followed through the next chemotherapy cycle or six weeks post discharge if it was the patient’s last cycle.

Phase of Care and Clinical Applications

  • PHASE OF CARE: Active anti-tumor treatment
  • APPLICATIONS:  Pediatrics, elder care

Study Design

Retrospective subgroup analysis of a large observational study.

Measurement Instruments/Methods

Data analyzed from previously collected variables from patient medical records. Variables measured included demographic information, laboratory values (albumin [decreased y/n], chemotherapy, neutropenia status, renal dysfunction [y/n], indwelling central line [y/n], corticosteroid use [y/n], parenteral nutrition [y/n], primary antifungal prophylaxis (PAP) administered [y/n]). Type of antifungal medications were also analyzed.

Results

Among the 2015 patients in this sub-study of patients with acute leukemia, 2,274 courses of chemotherapy were administered: 1,410 courses of chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia and 864 courses for acute lymphocytic leukemia. Patients treated for AML incurred more IFDs than patients with ALL (11.8% versus 7.1%, p < 0.001). IFD was also higher among patients who received induction chemotherapy (21.6%) compared to consolidation chemotherapy (3.7%) (p < 0.0001). IFD risk factors included decreased albumin, indwelling central line, parenteral nutrition, and being male. Receiving PAP was protective against IFD; significant for patients on induction chemotherapy (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

PAP is effective against IFD in patients undergoing induction chemotherapy for acute leukemia. PAP may reduce the risk of IFD in patients receiving consolidation chemotherapy, having a decreased serum albumin, indwelling central line, receiving parenteral nutrition, or having severe neutropenia.

Limitations

Risk of bias (no control group)

 

Nursing Implications

Understanding the risks for invasive fungal disease and recommending primary antifungal prophylaxis for patients receiving chemotherapy (particularly induction chemotherapy) for the treatment of acute leukemia.