Please login (Members) to view content or
(Nonmembers) this article.
No votes yet
Online Exclusive Article

Assessing Agreement Between Salivary Alpha Amylase Levels Collected by Passive Drool and Eluted Filter Paper in Adolescents With Cancer

Suzanne Ameringer
Cindy Munro
R. K. Elswick
ONF 2012, 39(4), E317-E323 DOI: 10.1188/12.ONF.E317-E323

Purpose/Objectives: To assess the validity of filter paper (FP) against the gold standard of passive drool (PD) for collecting salivary alpha amylase as a surrogate biomarker of psychological stress in adolescents with cancer.

Design: Part of a longitudinal, descriptive study of symptoms in adolescents with cancer during chemotherapy.

Setting: A pediatric hematology/oncology treatment center.

Sample: 33 saliva sample pairs from nine adolescents with cancer, aged 13-18 years.

Methods: Salivary alpha amylase was collected by PD and FP at four time points during a cycle of chemotherapy: days 1 (time 1) and 2 (time 2) of chemotherapy, day 7-10 (time 3), and day 1 of the next cycle (time 4). A random effects regression was used to assess the correlation between PD and FP values, and a Bland Altman analysis was conducted to assess agreement between the values.

Main Research Variables: Salivary alpha amylase.

Findings: The estimated correlation between PD and FP values was r = 0.91, p < 0.001. Regression results were also used to rescale FP values to the levels of the PD values because the FP values were on a different scale than the PD values. The Bland Altman analysis revealed that the agreement between the rescaled FP values and PD values was not satisfactory.

Conclusions: Eluted FP may not be a valid method for collecting salivary alpha amylase in adolescents with cancer.

Implications for Nursing: Psychological stress in adolescents with cancer may be linked to negative outcomes, such as greater symptom severity and post-traumatic stress disorder. Nurses need valid, efficient, biobehavioral measures to assess psychological stress in the clinical setting.

Members Only

Access to this article is restricted. Please login to view the full article.

Not a current ONS Member or journal subscriber?
Join/Renew Membership or