Purpose/Objectives: To investigate the lived experience of prostate cancer from a patient perspective.
Research Approach: Descriptive, qualitative.
Setting: Community setting.
Participants: 10 men with prostate cancer aged 62-70 years.
Methodologic Approach: A hermeneutic phenomenologic method using semistructured, open-ended questions addressing the lived experience.
Data Synthesis: Phenomenology of praxis proposed by van Manen guided the data analysis and transformed personal experiences into disciplinary understanding.
Findings: The use of van Manen's method of inquiry and analysis has contributed to the findings of the study by providing a way to explore the meaning of the lived experiences in an attempt to understand living with prostate cancer. Several themes were identified: living in the unknown, yearning to understand and know, struggling with unreliability of body, bearing the diagnosis of cancer, shifting priorities in the gap, and feeling comfort in the presence of others.
Conclusions: Oncology nurses can use van Manen's four fundamental existentials—lived space (spatiality), lived body (corporeality), lived time (temporality), and lived other (relationality)—to understand the lived experience of prostate cancer. Nurses have many opportunities to impact the lives of men diagnosed with prostate cancer, including diagnosis, management of physical integrity, management of psychosocial integrity, and providing education.
Interpretation: Nurses may encourage men to describe their diagnosis story and illness experience to better understand the meaning of the prostate cancer experience and to provide appropriate nursing care.
References
Bailey, D. E., Mishel, M. H., Belyea, M., & Stewart, J. L. (2004). Uncertainty intervention for watchful waiting in prostate cancer. Cancer Nursing, 27, 339-346.
Burns, N., & Grove, S. K. (2009). The practice of nursing research: Appraisal, synthesis and generation of evidence (6th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Saunders.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Crowe, H., & Costello, A. J. (2003). Prostate cancer: Perspectives on quality of life and impact of treatment on patients and their partners. Urologic Nursing, 23, 279-285.
Cummings, K. B. (2005). Management of prostate cancer, advances and controversies. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker.
Davison, B. J., Oliffe, J. L., Pickles, T., & Mroz, L. (2009). Factors influencing men undertaking active surveillance for the management of low-risk prostate cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum, 36, 89-96.
Eggenberger, S. K., Meiers, S.J, Krumwiede, N., Bliesmer, M., & Earle, P. (2011). Reintegration within families in the context of chronic illness: A family health promoting process. Journal of Nursing and Healthcare of Chronic Illness, 3, 283-292. doi:10.1111/j.1752-9824.2011.01101.x
Fan, A. (2002). Psychological and psychosocial effects of prostate cancer. Nursing Standard, 17(13), 33-37.
Harrington, J. M., Jones, E. G., & Badger, T. (2009). Body image perceptions in men with prostate cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum, 36, 167-172. doi:10.1188/09.ONF.167-172
Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Maliski, S. L., Kwan, L., Elashoff, D., & Litwin, M. S. (2008). Symptom clusters related to treatment for prostate cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum, 35, 786-793. doi:10.1188/08.ONF.786-793
van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. New York, NY: State University of New York.
van Manen, M. (1999). The pathic nature of inquiry and nursing. In I. Madjar & I. Walton (Eds.), Nursing and the experience of illness: Phenomenology in practice (pp. 17-38). London, England: Routledge.
