Triangulation refers to the use of multiple methods or data sources in qualitative research to develop a comprehensive understanding of phenomena (Patton, 1999). Triangulation also has been viewed as a qualitative research strategy to test validity through the convergence of information from different sources. Denzin (1978) and Patton (1999) identified four types of triangulation: (a) method triangulation, (b) investigator triangulation, (c) theory triangulation, and (d) data source triangulation. The current article will present the four types of triangulation followed by a discussion of the use of focus groups (FGs) and in-depth individual (IDI) interviews as an example of data source triangulation in qualitative inquiry.
Barbour, R. S. (1998). Mixing qualitative methods: Quality assurance or quagmire? <i>Qualitative Health Research, 8</i>, 352-361.
Brown, J. B. (1999). The use of focus groups for clinical research. In B. F. Crabtree & W. L. Miller (Eds.), <i>Doing qualitative research</i> (2nd ed., pp. 109-124). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Clayton, J. M., Butow, P. N., Arnold, R. M., & Tattersall, M. H. (2005). Discussing life expectancy with terminally ill cancer patients and their careers: A qualitative study. <i>Supportive Care in Cancer, 13</i>, 733-742.
DeJong, M. & Schellens, P. J. (1998). Focus groups or individual interviews? A comparison of text evaluation approaches. <i>Technical Communication, 45</i>, 77-88.
Denzin, N. K. (1978). <i>Sociological methods: A sourcebook.</i> New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Duggleby, W. (2005). What about focus group interaction data? <i>Qualitative Health Research, 15</i>, 832-840.
Fern, E. F. (1982). <i>The use of focus groups for idea generation: The effects of group size, acquaintanceship, and moderator on response quantity and quality.</i> Retrieved from <a target="_blank" href='http://www.uta.edu/faculty/richarme/MARK%205338/Articles/Fern.pdf'>http:...
Fontana, A. & Frey, J. H. (2000). The interview. From structured questions to negotiated text. In Y. S. Lincoln & N. K. Denzin (Eds.), <i>Handbook of qualitative research</i> (2nd ed., pp. 645-672). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Kaplowitz, M. D. (2000). Statistical analysis of sensitive topics in group and individual interviews. <i>Quality and Quantity, 34</i>, 419-431.
Kaplowitz, M. D. (2001). Assessing mangrove products and services at the local level: The use of focus groups and individual interviews. <i>Landscape and Urban Planning, 56</i>, 53-60.
Kaplowitz, M. D., & Hoehn, J. P. (2001). Do focus groups and individual interviews reveal the same information for natural resource valuation? <i>Ecological Economics, 36</i>, 237-247.
Kitzinger, J. (1994). The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interaction between research participants. <i>Sociology of Health and Illness, 16</i>, 103-121.
Lambert, S. D. & Loiselle, C. G. (2008). Combining individual interviews and focus groups to enhance data richness. <i>Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62</i>, 228-237. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04559.x
Lehoux, P., Poland, B., & Daudelin, G. (2006). Focus group research and "the patient's view." <i>Social Science and Medicine, 63</i>, 2091-2104.
Mansell, I., Bennett, G., Northway, R., Mead, D., & Moseley, L. (2004). The learning curve: The advantages and disadvantages in the use of focus groups as a method of data collection. <i>Nurse Researcher, 11</i>, 79-88.
Morgan, D. L. (1996). Focus groups. <i>Annual Review of Sociology, 22</i>, 129-152.
Morse, J. M. (2009). Mixing qualitative methods. <i>Qualitative Health Research, 19</i>, 1523-1524. doi:10.1177/1049732309349360
Patton, M. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. <i>Health Sciences Research, 34</i>, 1189-1208.
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2012). <i>Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice.</i> Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
Russell, C., Gregory, D., Ploeg, J., DiCenso, A., & Guyatt, G. (2005). Qualitative research. In A. DiCenso, G. Guyatt, & D. Ciliska (Eds.), <i>Evidence-based nursing: A guide to clinical practice</i> (pp. 120-136). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby.
Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description? <i>Research in Nursing and Health, 23</i>, 334-340.
Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2003). Classifying the findings in qualitative studies. <i>Qualitative Health Research, 13</i>, 905-923. doi:10.1177/1049732303253488
Webb, C. & Kevern, J. (2001). Focus groups as a research method: A critique of some aspects of their use in nursing research. <i>Journal of Advanced Nursing, 33</i>, 798-805. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01720.x
Wight, D. (1994). Boys' thoughts and talk about sex in a working class locality in Glasgow. <i>Sociological Review, 42</i>, 702-737.
Zorn, T. E., Roper, J., Broadfoot, K., & Weaver, C. K. (2006). Focus groups as sites of influential interaction: Building communicative self-efficacy and effecting attitudinal change in discussing controversial topics. <i>Journal of Applied Communication Research, 34</i>, 115-140. doi:10.1080/00909880600573965