Skip to main content

Cauwels, R.G., & Martens, L.C. (2011). Low level laser therapy in oral mucositis: A pilot study. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry, 12, 118–123.

Study Purpose

To study the capacity of pain relief and wound healing of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis in a pediatric population

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process

Children were treated using a GaAIAs diode laser with 830 nm continuous wavelength an output of 150 mW. Laser was applied every 48 hours until complete healing of the lesion occurred.

Sample Characteristics

  • The study reported on 16 patients with a mean age of 9.4 years.
  • The sample was 50% male and 50% female.
  • Patients had been diagnosed with leukemia and lymphoma (n = 12), neuroblastoma (n = 1), osteosarcoma (n = 1), Ewing’s sarcoma (n = 1), and germ cell tumor (n = 1).
  • All patients were receiving chemotherapy.

Setting

The study was conducted at a single site in Belgium.

Phase of Care and Clinical Applications

  • Patients were undergoing the active treatment phase of care.
  • The study has clinical applicability for pediatrics.

Study Design

The study used a convenience sample.

Measurement Instruments/Methods

  • The Modified Faces Pain Scale was used.
  • A visual analogue scale was used.
  • The World Health Organization (WHO) Oral Toxicity Scale was used.

Results

Fifty episodes of oral mucositis were included. Pain scores improved after each session with only one exception.

Conclusions

The LLLT appeared to be effective for pain relief in this population.

Limitations

  • The study sample size was small with fewer than 30 patients.
  • No control group was included.
  • Wound healing measures could have been used, as these are more objective.
Print

Castaman, G., Bona, E.D., Schiavotto, C., Trentin, L., D'Emilio, A., & Rodeghiero, F. (1997). Pilot study on the safety and efficacy of desmopressin for the treatment or prevention of bleeding in patients with hematologic malignancies. Haematologica, 82, 584–587.

Study Purpose

To determine if desmopressin use is effective to prevent bleeding episodes for patients with thrombocytopenia due to bone marrow failure or idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP)

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process

Desmopressin was delivered as 0.4 microgram/kg diluted in 100 mL of NS infused over 30 minutes. Bleeding time was assessed (using standard procedure) before the start of infusion and at one and four hours postinfusion. It is not clear how patients were chosen for inclusion in this study but all had a bleeding event.

Sample Characteristics

  • N = 15
  • MEDIAN AGE = 55.5 years (range = 24–82 years)
  • MALES: 80%, FEMALES: 20%
  • KEY DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Acute leukemia, blast crisis of CML, refractory anemia, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma
  • OTHER KEY SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS: Majority of patients were receiving chemotherapy or just following therapy. Patients had a bleeding episode or were going for a procedure where the risk of bleeding was high.

Setting

  • SITE: Single-site  
  • SETTING TYPE: Outpatient  
  • LOCATION: Italy

Phase of Care and Clinical Applications

  • PHASE OF CARE: Transition phase after active treatment
  • APPLICATIONS: Elder care 

Study Design

  • Pilot study

Measurement Instruments/Methods

  • Bleeding time was calculated using the Simplate II device.

Results

All of the patients had a favorable response after one infusion of desmopressin. Bleeding time slowed during infusion and stopped usually within one hour. No nasal packing was required. Patients were able to have scheduled dental procedures, none required platelet transfusions, and no significant side effects were noted from the desmopressin. None of the patients had evidence of disseminated intravascular coagulation.

Conclusions

The findings of this pilot study are interesting to consider for hematologic malignancy groups of patients who receive multiple platelet transfusions and are at risk to become refractory to platelets. Further experimentation is needed to validate the results found here, but on a case-by-case basis, desmopressin infusion could be helpful to decrease bleeding time in thrombocytopenic patients.

Limitations

  • Small sample (< 30)
  • Baseline sample/group differences of import
  • Risk of bias (no control group)
  • Risk of bias (no blinding) 
  • Risk of bias (no random assignment) 
  • Risk of bias (no appropriate attentional control condition) 
  • Risk of bias (sample characteristics)
  • Measurement validity/reliability questionable
  • Findings not generalizable
 

 

Nursing Implications

At this time, this pilot study does not warrant a change in practice due to its severe limitations of generalizability. There needs to be randomized, clinical trials before a change in practice can be endorsed.

Print

Castagna, L., Bramanti, S., Levis, A., Michieli, M. G., Anastasia, A., Mazza, R., . . . Santoro, A. (2010). Pegfilgrastim versus filgrastim after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell support. Annals of Oncology, 21, 1482–1485.

 

Study Purpose

To demonstrate that one single fixed dose of pegfilgrastim (PEG) was not inferior compared to daily doses of filgrastim after high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and autologous peripheral stem cell transplant.

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process

Comparisons between two different granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) (i.e., PEG and filgrastim) were highlighted in this article. The researcher wanted to reveal that PEG is the same high quality as filgrastim after receiving HDC and peripheral blood stem cells starting from day 1. A single fixed dose of PEG was given 24 hours after stem cell infusion.  In the control arm, 5 mcg/kg/day of filgrastim was given from day 1 until absolute neutrophil count (ANC) recovered to greater than .5x 109/l.  Each setting followed its own supportive care and prophylaxis guidelines; however, all patients received quinolone prophylaxis.

Sample Characteristics

  • Seventy-seven of 80 patients were enrolled (three were excluded).
  • Patients included were older than 18 years.     
  • Fifty-six percent of patients were male and 44% were female. 
  • Key disease characteristics were multiple myeloma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, Hodgkin lymphoma, acute leukemia, and solid tumors.
  • Other key sample characteristics were duration of severe neutropenia, ANC recovery days, febrile days, requirement of antibiotics, disease status, and conditioning regimen.

Setting

  • Multi-site (three)  
  • Inpatient and outpatient 
  • The locations were not specified.

Phase of Care and Clinical Applications

  • Patients were undergoing the active treatment phase of care.
  • The study has clinical applicability for late effects and survivorship. 

Study Design

This was an open-label, randomized study with a noninferiority design.

Measurement Instruments/Methods

  • Duration of severe neutropenia (ANC <.5x109/l)
  • Number of days to achieve ANC greater tha 1.0x109/l
  • Number of days with fever greater than 38°C
  • Duration of antibiotic and antimycotic therapy
  • Number of documented infections
     

Results

This study illustrated that the use of a single fixed dose of PEG was not inferior to the use of daily filgrastim. There were no significant differences in measured outcomes between the two groups and no differences in treatment side effects.

Conclusions

PEG can be use alternately to filgrastim as it is only given as one single fixed dose of 6 mg as compared to daily doses of filgrastim.  Infection-related outcomes studied were not different between these two treatment approaches.

Limitations

  • Small sample (<100)
  • No blinding, with risk of bias. 
  • Other prophylactic treatments varied at different study settings, so care to prevent infections was not consistent for all patients in the study.

Nursing Implications

Use of a single dose of PEG rather than daily injections of filgrastim may be a useful alternative for these types of patients in order to avoid multiple injections.  Findings of this study were limited by sample size, study design issues, and the fact that other prophylactic treatment was not consistent throughout the sample.  Further research in this area will be helpful to confirm differences in the relative equivalency of these two approaches.

Print

Castagna, L., Benhamou, E., Pedraza, E., Luboinski, M., Forni, M., Brandes, I., … Dietrich, P.-Y. (2001). Prevention of mucositis in bone marrow transplantation: A double blind randomised controlled trial of sucralfate. Annals of Oncology, 12, 953–955.

Study Purpose

To compare placebo to sucralfate for prevention of mucositis in high-dose chemotherapy and bone marrow transplant (BMT)

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process

Treatment was started one day before the regimen. Patients received one 2 g dose pack every three hours during the day and once during the night if awakened for a maximum of 7 per 24 hours until bone marrow (BM) recovery or end of mucositis.

Sample Characteristics

The study reported on 102 patients hospitalized for allogeneic or autologous BMT.

Setting

The study was conducted between April 1991 and November 1993.

Study Design

This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.

Measurement Instruments/Methods

Patients were examined twice weekly by two physicians only, recorded prospectively, according to adapted Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon (OMS) criteria for grafted patients.

Results

  • Slightly less patients in the sucralfate group (84%) experienced any grade mucositis compared to placebo (88%).
  • Incidence of grade 3-4 mucositis was lower in the sucralfate group (29%) versus placebo (47%) (p = 0.07).
  • The rate of severe mucositis was decreased possibly because of mechanical mouth rinses.
  • When adjusted for total body irradiation (TBI), the p value for frequency of grade 3–4 mucositis in patients who received sucralfate versus placebo was 0.06.

Limitations

  • Long-term administration of sucralfate was not possible in this patient population because of nausea and vomiting.
  • This study was conducted more than 20 years ago.
  • The summary claims effectiveness for oral and intestinal mucositis; however, data does not support this claim.
Print

Cassileth, B.R., Van Zee, K.J., Yeung, K.S., Coleton, M.I., Cohen, S., Chan, Y.H., … Hudis, C.A. (2013). Acupuncture in the treatment of upper-limb lymphedema: Results of a pilot study. Cancer, 119, 2455–2461.

Study Purpose

To evaluate the safety and potential efficacy of acupuncture in the treatment of arm lymphedema in women with breast cancer-related lymphedema

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process

Each patient was given acupuncture treatment twice weekly for four weeks. Treatments lasted 30 minutes, as 14 needles were inserted at apecific points determined on the basis of history and consensus of experienced acupuncturists.  Arm circumference was measured before and after each treatment.

Sample Characteristics

  • The study consisted of 33 patients with a mean age of 55 years.
  • All of the participants were female and had breast cancer-related arm lymphedema.
  • Time from surgery was a median of 3.9 years. 
  • Most patients were reported to be on standard lymphedema therapy prior to enrollment.

Setting

This was a single-site, outpatient study conducted at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York.

Phase of Care and Clinical Applications

This study has clinical applicability for late effects and survivorship.

Study Design

This was a prospective trial.

Measurement Instruments/Methods

  • Arm circumference was measured.
  • The percent change in lymphedema was calucated by taking the largest pretreatment difference between arms minus the same site posttreatment difference and dividing that number by the largest pretreatment difference.

Results

  • Just more than three-fourths of the patients (76%) received all intervention sessions. Of these, 33% showed reduction of 30% or more in lymphedema and 55% showed reduction of 20% or more. Mean reduction in the extent of lymphedema was 0.90 cm (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72–1.07, p < 0.0005). 
  • A segment of patients (12%) reported sustained improvement for four months during follow up; however, the method of obtaining this information was not clearly described. 
  • Additionally, 36.4% of patients reported mild bruising or minor pain or tingling in the arm or shoulder at least once. One patient experienced a transient increase in lymphedema.

Conclusions

Findings suggest that acupuncture can be safely provided to patients with arm lymphedema. However, the benefit is unclear because of study design limitations and the fact that the mean change in lymphedema was very small.

Limitations

  • The sample size was small with fewer than 100 patients.
  • A risk of bias exists because no control group, blinding, or random assignment was used.
  • Unintended interventions or applicable interventions that were not described could have influenced results.
  • The measurement methods were not well described.
  • The measurement validity and reliability was questionable.
  • The method of lymphedema measurement was not as rigorous as possible. The actual “standard” treatments used are not described, and it is not known if any changes occurred in the standard approaches during the study period, such as activity changes. 
  • The report of duration of effect on follow-up was not clearly described.

Nursing Implications

This study provides insufficient evidence to support efficacy of acupuncture for lymphedema management.

Print

Cassileth, B.R., Van Zee, K.J., Chan, Y., Coleton, M.I., Hudis, C.A., Cohen, S., . . . Vickers, A.J. (2011). A safety and efficacy pilot study of acupuncture for the treatment of chronic lymphoedema. Acupuncture in Medicine: Journal of the British Medical Acupuncture Society, 29(3),170–172.

Study Purpose

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of acupuncture in women diagnosed with chronic lymphedema

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process

Women with chronic lymphedema after breast cancer surgery received acupuncture twice a week for four weeks using Acupoint prescription, chosen by consensus from members of the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Integrative Medicine Service certified acupuncturists.

Sample Characteristics

  • The study sample (N = 9) was comprised of female patients aged 18 years or older.
  • Median age of patients was 54 years.
  • All patients had lymphedema (arm circumference greater than 2 cm in comparison to unaffected arm) for at least six months and no more than five years as a result of surgery or radiation therapy for breast cancer.
  • Patients were excluded from the study if they had previous acupuncture treatment for lymphedema or current use of diuretics.

Setting

The study took place at the Integrative Medicine Service and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York.

Phase of Care and Clinical Applications

The study has clinical applicability for late effects and survivorship.

Study Design

The study used a prospective pilot design.

Measurement Instruments/Methods

  • Upper extremity volume was measured at two places on both the affected and unaffected extremities. The site with the greater difference between the affected and unaffected arms was used to determine the baseline measurement and assess outcome by comparing changes in the baseline measures.
  • Positive response was considered to be 30% reduction in the difference in size between affected and unaffected upper extremities after four weeks of treatment.

Results

After nine subjects were treated, four women demonstrated a 30% reduction in limb volume after four weeks of treatment, with no significant adverse events occurring. Some patients did experience minor toxicities, such as slight bruising or minor pain at acupuncture site shortly after treatment.

Conclusions

The pilot study suggests that acupuncture for women with arm lymphedema may be practical and was not associated with significant adverse effects. Further research in this area to establish safety and begin to evaluate effectiveness is planned.

Limitations

  • The sample size was small with less than 30 patients.
  • Sample characteristics present a risk of bias.
  • Measurements and methods were not well described.

Nursing Implications

Additional robust randomized controlled trials are needed to evaluate the use of acupuncture for the treatment of lymphedema.

Print

Cassileth, B.R., & Vickers, A.J. (2004). Massage therapy for symptom control: Outcome study at a major cancer center. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 28, 244–249.
 

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process

  • Massage therapy (i.e., Swedish, light touch, foot); manipulation of soft tissue
  • Average time: 20 minutes for inpatients and 60 minutes for outpatients
  • Tactile stimulation is essential to development and survival.

Sample Characteristics

  • N = 1,290 patients
  • No demographics were provided.
  • KEY SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS: Fatigue was a presenting symptom in 312 patients.

Setting

  • SETTING TYPE: Inpatient and outpatient settings
  • LOCATION: A large, specialized cancer center

Phase of Care and Clinical Applications

  • PHASE OF CARE: Active treatment, long-term follow-up

Study Design

  • Retrospective review of clinical data from first massage episode

Measurement Instruments/Methods

  • Numeric rating scale (0–10) of extent to which fatigue was experienced as bothersome (0 = not at all bothersome; 10 = extremely bothersome) on a 5\" x 8\" card
  • Other measures: Pain, nausea, anxiety

Results

  • Mean fatigue improved from 4.7–2.7, which is a 40.7% reduction.
  • When patients with a fatigue score of more than 4 were included, fatigue decreased from a mean of 6.6 (SD = 1.8) to a mean of 3.8 (SD = 2.6).
  • Effects were smaller and less persistent in inpatients.

Limitations

  • No control or randomization was included.
  • The sample was not described.
  • Fatigue change scores were reported for the total sample at baseline and post-treatment only; however, in a subgroup followed at 12-, 24-, and 48-hours post-massage, the effects of massage on symptom distress were sustained in outpatients. The effects of massage were smaller and less persistent for inpatients, but the researchers noted that inpatients tended to receive shorter massage treatments in less comfortable settings than did outpatients. The relationship between the length of massage treatment and the size and duration of effects is worthy of further study.   
  • Weak or cachectic patients may only tolerate foot massage.
  • A licensed massage therapist is needed; otherwise, the intervention is inexpensive.

Nursing Implications

Promising results warrant a controlled trial.

Print

Cassileth, B. R., & Vickers, A. J. (2004). Massage therapy for symptom control: outcome study at a major cancer center. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 28, 244–249.

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process

Patients received one of three types of massage therapy and were asked to report their symptoms posttherapy. Massages were provided by 12 licensed massage therapists. Patients were referred by physicians, nurses, or self. Patients received Swedish, light touch, or foot massage according to their preference. On average, sessions lasted 20 minutes for inpatients and 60 minutes for outpatients.

Sample Characteristics

In total, 1,290 patients were included. 

Setting

Inpatient and outpatient

Measurement Instruments/Methods

Patients reported the level of symptom distress (0–10) on a card prior to and following massage therapy. Comparisons were analyzed by analysis of covariance, with the baseline score as the covariate.

Results

The effect of massage on symptom relief was demonstrated as a positive response with respect to depression.

Limitations

  • Participants were not randomized.
  • The information about the study demographics or participants did not include enough detail.
  • There was no standard procedure for length of massage or specific type of session. Patients had a choice of three techniques.
  • Patients were referred to massage therapy, including self-referral. Self-referral may skew the posttherapy reports because patients expect a benefit.
  • No standardized assessment tool was used to measure the results because symptoms were rated on a card.
  • There was no way to differentiate which of the massage techniques was the most beneficial.
Print

Cassileth, B.R., & Vickers, A.J. (2004). Massage therapy for symptom control: Outcome study at a major cancer center. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 28, 244-249.

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process

Patients with cancer received light touch, Swedish, or foot massage. No control group was included.

Sample Characteristics

  • The study consisted of 1,290 participants. Of these, 1,255 reported on the nausea question.
  • Researchers were unable to ascertain which patients were receiving chemotherapy.
  • Patients were self-referred or referred by a physician.

Setting

The study was conducted in Inpatient and outpatient settings.

Measurement Instruments/Methods

A visual analog scale (VAS) was used to measure nausea and vomiting, pain, fatigue, stress, anxiety, and depression.

Results

Just more than half (51%) experienced a decrease in nausea.

Limitations

A risk of bias exists for nontraditional treatment.

Print

Casley-Smith, J.R. & Casley-Smith, J.R. (1996). Lymphedema initiated by aircraft flights. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 67(1), 52–56.

Purpose & Patient Population

To describe reported incidence and triggering factors related to development of lymphedema in patients with lymphedema

Type of Resource/Evidence-Based Process

Questionnaires were sent to 1,020 patients with lymphedema. The names were taken from the Lymphedema Association of Australia. The questionnaire asked about many aspects of their disease. One of the questions was “What triggered your lymphedema?\" Answer choices were infection, insect bite, plane flight, burn, other, or unknown.

Results Provided in the Reference

Questionnaires were sent to 1,020 patients with lymphedema. A total of 749 responded to the survey, and 531 of these answered the question about what triggered the lymphedema. Responses were as follows: 41 had the condition since birth, 163 had postmastectomy lymphedemas, 136 had primary and 191 had secondary leg lymphedemas. Of those who did not have the condition since birth (n = 490), 27 claimed that it started during an aircraft flight (15 legs and 12 arms). In addition, flying was the identified cause of existing lymphedema to permanently worsen in 23 arms and 44 legs.

Print
Subscribe to