Skip to main content

Cimprich, B., & Ronis, D.L. (2003). An environmental intervention to restore attention in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Cancer Nursing, 26, 284–292.

Study Purpose

To determine the efficacy of a natural restorative environmental intervention in counteracting cognitive or attentional fatigue in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process

Patients were randomly assigned to an intervention protocol after the first assessment and before any treatment. Intervention was comprised of a home-based program involving 120 minutes of exposure to the natural environment per week. Assessments were done approximately 17 days before surgery and 19 days after surgery. Intervention included the following:

1.  Verbatim explanation of purpose and written summary in booklet form
2.  Identification and selection of preferred activities from a compiled list of possible nature activities. Each participant also received a membership to the university botanical garden.
3.  A written agreement signed by the participants stating that they would carry out the selected nature activities for at least 120 minutes per week

Sample Characteristics

  • N: Total number n = 185 recruited, 159 completed testing at both time periods, and 2 were excluded for incomplete data.   
  • MEAN AGE = 53.8 years (SD = 11.4 years; range = 27-86 years)
  • FEMALES: 100%
  • KEY DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Breast cancer
  • OTHER KEY SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS: Ethnicity: 89% Caucasian, 11% non-Caucasian
  • ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Female patients with a confirmed new diagnosis of early stage breast cancer who had a primary treatment plan of breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy

Setting

LOCATION: Midwestern university medical center

Study Design

Longitudinal, randomized study

Measurement Instruments/Methods

  • Digit Span forward and backward test: Standard test of capacity to direct attention (CDA) mediated by auditory and verbal processing
  • Trail Making Test Parts A & B (TMT): TMT is a test of CDA requiring effective inhibition of competing responses for accurate completion of the task in a timely manner.
  • Necker Cube Pattern Control Test directly measures an individual’s ability to inhibit competing stimuli or to direct attention.
  • Symptom Distress Scale (SDS): Indicator for the degree of distress in relation to common symptoms such as pain, loss of appetite, insomnia, decreased mobility, abnormal bowel function, fatigue, loss of concentration, and changes in appearance

Results

The intervention group scored significantly better than the nonintervention group on DSF (p = 0.04), DSB (p = 0.002), TMT-A (p = 0.001), TMT-B (p = 0.02), and the total attention score (p < 0.001). Other covariates such as age, years of education, symptom distress at time 2, extent of surgery, and presence of other health problems accounted for 54% of the variance in total attention score (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Intervention group showed greater recovery of a capacity to direct attention from the pretreatment to the preadjuvant therapy period as compared to the nonintervention group.

Print

Cid, J., & Lozano, M. (2007). Lower or higher doses for prophylactic platelet transfusions: Results of a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Transfusion, 47, 464–470.

Search Strategy

INCLUSION CRITERIA:

  • Looked at randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reported through December 2005
  • Treatment groups included adult patients (older than age 16 years) receiving high-dose transfused platelets (HDPs) and adult patients receiving a lower dose of transfused platelets (LDPs).
  • Reported data included
    • Mean difference in the transfusion interval
    • Mean difference in the post-transfusion platelet (PLT) count increment
    • Odds ratio (OR) of bleeding in the HDP group versus the LDP group.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Children were excluded.

Sample Characteristics

  • FINAL NUMBER STUDIES INCLUDED = 5
  • SAMPLE RANGE ACROSS STUDIES: 46–120
  • KEY SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS: The proportion of male patients ranged from 37%–60%. The median age was 38–55 years. Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia was included in all five trials. Three trials included patients with acute leukemia and undergoing bone marrow transplantation (BMT). One trial only included patients who underwent BMT. One trial included patients with acute leukemia and breast cancer. The total number of platelet transfusions administered ranged from 96–311. Platelets were collected by apheresis in four trials and by apheresis and whole blood donation in one trial. 

 

Results

HDP groups showed a longer transfusion interval compared to the LDP group (p < 0.00001). Four studies with available data showed a significant increase in the transfusion interval when a high PLT dose was transfused. All transfused platelets were less than 24 hours old in one study and less than 72 hours old in another study. In two studies, the median number of days in which platelets were transfused was 3.71 and 2.3, respectively. In four of five trials, a significant increase in the post-transfusion PLT count increment was observed in the HDP group compared to the LDP group (p < 0.01). A significant increase in the proportion of bleeding patients was observed in the HDP group versus the LDP group. However monitoring of patients for bleeding varied, and methodologic challenges were encountered when analyzing the bleeding data. In addition, two of three trials were designed to analyze the efficacy of the transfusion of an HDP or an LDP; the presence of hemorrhage was a secondary endpoint. Only one trial was designed to look at the transfusion of lower-dose PLT in terms of safety. Outcomes only were available in three trials. No significant difference was observed in the OR of bleeding in the HDP or LDP group.  

Nursing Implications

Two trials are being conducted that the authors hope will provide information to clearly define the optimal dose of PLTs to transfuse prophylactically in patients with thrombocytopenia.

Print

Chung, V.C., Wu, X., Lu, P., Hui, E.P., Zhang, Y., Zhang, A.L., . . . Wu, J.C. (2016). Chinese herbal medicine for symptom management in cancer palliative care: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine, 95, e2793. 

Purpose

STUDY PURPOSE: To summarize the results from randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) of the effectiveness of Chinese herbal medicines (CHMs) for managing fatigue, paresthesias, chronic pain, anorexia, edema, and constipation

TYPE OF STUDY: Meta-analysis and systematic review

Search Strategy

DATABASES USED: AMED, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Chinese Biomedical Databases, Wan Feng Digital Journals, Taiwan Periodical Literature Database
 
INCLUSION CRITERIA: RCTs comparing the effect of CHM in combination with other treatments or alone in managing cancer or treatment-related symptoms. RCTs must report the effectiveness of CHM on at least one symptom using validated scales. RCTs must include at least one CHM in the 2010 China Pharmacopeia Chinese herbal medicine index. The control groups included conventional treatment, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, placebo, or no treatment. RCTs reported information on regimens in both treatment and control groups, and the follow-up duration was clearly reported.
 
EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Not identified

Literature Evaluated

TOTAL REFERENCES RETRIEVED: 4,767
 
EVALUATION METHOD AND COMMENTS ON LITERATURE USED: Two reviewers extracted data on RCT characteristics (author, year, country, eligibility criteria, diagnostic criteria); patient characteristics (CHM, control interventions, outcomes, effect size for each outcome, adverse effects). The data analysis used risk of bias (Cochrane risk of bias tool), relative risk, weighted mean difference, 95% confidence interval, I2 statistic for level of heterogeneity, and funnel plot for publication bias.

Sample Characteristics

  • FINAL NUMBER STUDIES INCLUDED = 14 
  • TOTAL PATIENTS INCLUDED IN REVIEW = 878
  • SAMPLE RANGE ACROSS STUDIES: 35–124 patients
  • KEY SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS: Various cancer sites

Phase of Care and Clinical Applications

PHASE OF CARE: Multiple phases of care
 
APPLICATIONS: Elder care, palliative care

Results

  • Fatigue—four RCTs. In three RCTs, no difference existed between CHM and chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone. In the other RCT, Fu Zheng decoction plus chemotherapy (ellence [epirubicin]/paclitaxel [taxol]) improved fatigue score compared to chemotherapy alone in breast cancer (MD: –18.62, 95% CI [–24.18, –13.16]).
  • Pain—three RCTs. CHM plus conventional treatment decreased the pain score compared to conventional treatment alone (WMD: –0.9, 95% CI [–1.69, –0.11]).
  • Constipation—seven RCTs. In six RCTs, CHM compared to conventional treatment had a similar effect. In the other RCT, Tong-Tai decoction plus chemotherapy compared to chemotherapy alone showed no difference.
  • Anorexia—two RCTs. No difference existed with CHM plus conventional treatment.

Conclusions

Combining CHM with chemotherapy may improve fatigue in patients with breast cancer. Adding CHM to conventional treatment may improve pain control. CHM alone may improve constipation.

Limitations

  • Mostly low quality/high risk of bias studies
  • High heterogeneity
  • Trials conducted and published in China

Nursing Implications

Further research needs to be performed on CHM treating cancer- and cancer treatment-related symptoms.

Print

Chung, C., Lee, S., Hwang, S., & Park, E. (2013). Systematic review of exercise effects on health outcomes in women with breast cancer. Asian Nursing Research, 7, 149–159. 

Purpose

STUDY PURPOSE: To explore the effects of exercise on health outcomes for women with breast cancer
 
TYPE OF STUDY: Systematic review

Search Strategy

DATABASES USED: MEDLINE and EMBASE
 
KEYWORDS: Breast neoplasm, breast cancer, breast tumor, breast carcinoma, breast adenocarcinoma, breast sarcoma, mastectomy, lymph node excision, lymph node dissection, sentinel lymph node biopsy, rehabilitation, physical therapy techniques, musculoskeletal manipulation, sports, physical activity, walking, jogging, cycling, bicycling, dance, aerobic, weight, training, muscle, endurance, resistance, strength, stretching, movement, and motion
 
INCLUSION CRITERIA: Included women who were diagnosed with breast cancer, studies that revealed that the women had undergone any type of surgical procedure, studies that reported any type of exercise intervention, and studies that were published in a journal or book in English or Korean
 
EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Animal studies, unoriginal articles (e.g., using secondary data), studies written in neither Korean nor English, unpublished grey articles, case studies, studies not dealing with postoperative patients with breast cancer, studies not evaluating the effectiveness of exercise intervention with a control, and studies not reporting relevant health outcomes

Literature Evaluated

TOTAL REFERENCES RETRIEVED: 902
 
EVALUATION METHOD AND COMMENTS ON LITERATURE USED: The guidelines of the National Evidence-Based Healthcare Collaborating Agency were followed. Quality of evidence and internal validity were assessed using the Korean version of the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) methodology containing 10 items, which was translated from the original checklist developed in 2008 by SIGN.

Sample Characteristics

FINAL NUMBER STUDIES INCLUDED = 11
 
TOTAL PATIENTS INCLUDED IN REVIEW = 902
 
SAMPLE RANGE ACROSS STUDIES: 30–154 patients
 
KEY SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS: Women diagnosed with breast cancer who underwent a surgical intervention

Results

The physical, psychological, physiologic, and behavioral aspects of the patients included in most of the studies were changed significantly by the exercise interventions. Physiotherapy improved range of motion, shoulder function, and pain, regardless of the intervention dosages. The effect of the interventions on lymphedema wasn’t apparent at six months but was visible at 12 months’ follow-up. Eight weeks of aerobic exercise was effective for psychological and behavioral outcomes through 24 weeks postintervention, but no significant long-term physical health effects were apparent. Aqualymphatic therapy affected emotional and social quality of life (QOL) but not physical QOL or limb volume. Dance and movement was not effective for lymphedema or health-related QOL. It only was effective for breast cancer-related QOL. Home-based rehabilitation improved some range of motion but did not affect pain, lymphedema, or strength.

Conclusions

Physical therapy is beneficial for shoulder range of motion when implemented soon after surgery. Any type of structured exercise could improve shoulder mobility, range of motion, and shoulder function in a relatively short period of time. The long-term effects of physiotherapy need to be studied more extensively. Multimodal exercise and comprehensive rehabilitation, including physical therapy, had physical and psychological effects. Aerobic exercise and dance and movement had a positive psychological effect. Exercise is essential to lymphedema treatment and management.

Limitations

Few of the studies included long-term follow-up to measure the effects of the interventions on lymphedema development and severity.

Nursing Implications

Informing patients with breast cancer about the importance of exercise after receiving surgery and teaching patients ways to decrease the limitations that may occur after surgery is necessary.

Print

Chujo, M., Mikami, I., Takashima, S., Saeki, T., Ohsumi, S., Aogi, K., et al. (2005). A feasibility study of psychosocial group intervention for breast cancer patients with first recurrence. Supportive Care in Cancer, 13, 503–514.

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process

The intervention was a six-week structured psychosocial support group of 90 minutes led by a male psychiatrist and nurses with experience in facilitation cancer groups. Each group member received

  • 20 minutes for stress-management method and problem-solving method
  • 50 minutes for discussion on coping
  • 20 minutes for learning progressive muscle relaxation (PMR) and audiotapes to use twice a day.

Measurements were done at baseline, then immediately following the six-week intervention, then three months and six months later.

Eleven women refused to participate but were interested in group intervention and consented to answering questionnaires. These women were given materials after completion of the survey and the PMR tape.

Sample Characteristics

  • The participants were Japanese women with first recurrence of breast cancer (recurrence within three months to one year of initial diagnosis).
  • The intervention group consisted of 28 participants (19 finished the trial); 11 women refused to participate.

Study Design

The study design was quasi-experimental without a control group.

Measurement Instruments/Methods

  • Profile of Mood States (POMS)
  • Impact of Event Scale–Revised
  • Mental Adjustment to Cancer Scale
  • EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire—Cancer 30/Breast module 23 (QLQ-C30/Br23)
  • Dunnett’s test to examine changes in scores between baseline and at three and six months after the intervention

Results

Results in the intervention group revealed significant changes in scores for tension-anxiety on POMS in the period up to three months after the intervention; no differences were noted at six months after the intervention.

Limitations

  • The study had a nonrandomized design.
  • The study had a small sample size.
Print

Chuang, C. Y., Han, W. R., Li, P. C., & Young, S. T. (2010). Effects of music therapy on subjective sensations and heart rate variability in treated cancer survivors: a pilot study. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 18, 224–226.

Study Purpose

To determine the effects of music therapy on subjective sensations and physiologic parameters of heart rate variability (HRV) in treated cancer survivors.The hypothesis was that music therapy significantly affects the sensations of fatigue, comfort, and relaxation, as well as the activities of the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems.

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process

Participants were asked to sit and rest for five minutes to stabilize their heart and respiration rates when they first arrived in the group therapy room. An electrocardiogram (ECG) signal then was measured for five minutes, and fatigue, comfort, and relaxation were rated subjectively on the visual analog mood scales (VAMS) as a pretest. After participating in two hours of music therapy, the same procedure was performed again as a posttest.  

The two-hour music therapy intervention consisted of three activities. In the first activity, the program aimed at establishing a rapport between therapists and participants through singing and listening. The song for the first activity was a popular Taiwanese song called ‘‘He is Our Treasure,’’ which had pleasant moderate rhythm and tempo. The second activity was to learn how to play the recorder. This activity used simple musical instrument learning to establish the participants’ self-confidence. The third activity was to perform the main five notes of a familiar melody song, ‘‘Grandfather’s Clock,’’ following the therapist’s electric keyboard accompaniment and conduct. This activity sought to encourage the participants to express themselves through playing the recorder and to create light and joyful emotions.

Sample Characteristics

  • The sample was comprised of 23 women with cancer (breast [n = 19], ovary [n = 2], cervical [n = 1], and bone [n = 1]).   
  • Mean age was 49.9 years (standard deviation = 9.2 years) (range 30–67).
  • Participants were recruited from the Hope Society for Cancer Care in Taipei, Taiwan.

Setting

  • Single site
  • Outpatient
  • Taiwan

Phase of Care and Clinical Applications

  • Patients were undergoing the posttreatment phase of care.
  • The study has clinical applicability for late effects and survivorship.

Study Design

The study used a pre-/posttest, quasiexperimental design.

Measurement Instruments/Methods

  • ECG monitoring    
  • VAMS
  • HRV monitor
  • The study assessed whether participants were fatigued, comfortable, and relaxed, but no questionnaire was described.
     

Results

Comparison of the quantitative HRV measures at pre- and posttest revealed that the high frequency (HF) power and normalized HF power were significantly higher, and the low frequency (LF)/HF ratio and normalized LF power of HRV were significantly lower at posttest than at pretest (p < 0.05). The VAMS mean value for the fatigue level was significant lower after music therapy (p < 0.05). The VAMS mean value for relaxation level was significant higher after music therapy (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

In a small sample size including varied cancer diagnoses with limited information about the study participants, the assessment showed changes in fatigue, relaxation, comfort, and HRV.

Limitations

  • The study had a very small sample, with less than 30 participants.
  • The study lacked a control group.
  • The study included various cancer diagnoses.
  • The study used a cross-sectional design.
  • Symptom instruments were not multidimensional or psychometrically tested, and no description was given for how the symptom questions were presented to the participants.   

Nursing Implications

Additional research is needed, including the use of psychometrically tested symptom instruments. Based on the descriptive findings in this very small initial study evaluating HRV, fatigue, and relaxation, it may not be appropriate to include it in PEP topic research. This study was completed by colleagues in a biomedical engineering school. Describing the process of how this was accomplished (e.g., surveys with nurses assisting) might be useful.

Print

Cho, Y., Do, J., Jung, S., Kwon, O., & Jeon, J.Y. (2016). Effects of a physical therapy program combined with manual lymphatic drainage on shoulder function, quality of life, lymphedema incidence, and pain in breast cancer patients with axillary web syndrome following axillary dissection. Supportive Care in Cancer, 24, 2047–2057. 

Study Purpose

To assess the benefits of standard physical therapy (PT) compared to PT with manual lymph drainage (MLD) on lymphedema incidence, shoulder function, pain, and cording in patients with breast cancer with axillary web syndrome (AWS)

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process

  • Participants were divided into one of two groups: Participants in group 1 (n = 20) received PT (three times per week for four weeks). Participants in group 2 (n = 21) received PT combined with MLD (five times a week for four weeks), where participants independently performed MLD therapy on their own when not at rehab. All outpatient visits were supervised. All participants were prescribed nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories twice a day.  
  • Exercise interventions included 10-minute warm up and 10-minute cool down stretches.  
  • Upper extremity strength: Three different pulley exercises (3 sets of 10 repetitions)
  • Shoulder flexion, abduction, and elbow flexion strength exercise: Theraband (3 sets of 10 repetitions)  
  • MLD: 30 minutes of tissue mobilization of tight tissues of the chest wall, and antecubital fossa with full-hand or two-finger contact. Longitudinal tissue stretches of the cords with the arm in abduction, followed by scapular mobilization

Sample Characteristics

  • N = 41   
  • AGE = 46.6 years (group 1), 50.7 years (group 2)
  • FEMALES: 100%
  • KEY DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Patients with breast cancer with postoperative palpable and visible axillary cording in the axilla and the arm, pain rated greater than 3 on a numeric rating scale (NRS)

Setting

  • SITE: Single site   
  • SETTING TYPE: Outpatient    
  • LOCATION: South Korea

Phase of Care and Clinical Applications

PHASE OF CARE: Late effects and survivorship

Study Design

This was a prospective, randomized trial of patients with breast cancer who had undergone surgery and were randomized to two therapy interventions.

Measurement Instruments/Methods

  • Participants were measured at the start of therapy and again at the end of therapy. The therapist who performed the measurements was blinded to the study groups. 
  • Arm volume was measured using a measuring tape. Circumference measurements were taken at 4-cm intervals from the wrist to the axilla, with which volume was calculated.
  • Muscular strength: Handheld Dynameter measured three times the average used for shoulder flexion and abduction, elbow flexion
  • Active ROM (AROM) measured with a digital inclinometer in the shoulder positions supine flexion and supine abduction; each were performed three times, and the averages were used.
  • Quality of life: The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), 30 questions with five functional and three symptom areas; the EORTC QLQ-BC, 23 questions, either functional or symptom
  • Visible and palpable cording in the arm and the axilla: The presence or absence of the authors' recording was determined by the rehabilitation physician.  
  • Arm disability: The 30-item Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, which is not breast cancer specific, was used to assess upper limb function. High scores indicate greater disability.
  • Pain: Patients rated their pain on a scale of 0–10 when performing shoulder abduction.

Results

  • Quality of life based on the two questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C and EORTC QLQ-BC) showed significant improvement in both the physical therapy group and the physical therapy combined with MLD group (p > 0.05).  
  • Shoulder flexor strength, shoulder flexion, and abduction range of motion (ROM) improved; DASH score and pain NRS score also improved in both groups (p > 0.05). NRS scores decreased more in the PT and MLD group (p > 0.05). Visible cording: 28.5% continued in the PT and MLD group and 35% in the PT only group.  
  • Arm volume significantly increased in the physical therapy group (p > 0.05). Six patients developed lymphedema, which was verified with a lymphoscintigraphy. The typical incidence range of lymphedema is 13%–65%. In this study, 33.3% developed lymphedema. 
  • Overall significant changes occurred in all areas in both groups but not between groups except for the PT and MLD group, which did not experience any volume increase. A significant increase of lymphedema was seen in the PT group.

Conclusions

All patients benefited from postoperative PT, but patients who had PT and MLD did not develop lymphedema. Measurements were not taken weekly, so when the changes in arm volume occurred cannot be identified. This study supports wearing compression during therapy. Patients are at risk for lymphedema even when engaging in supervised exercise.

Limitations

  • Small sample (< 100)
  • As stated by the authors, a control group would have allowed an observation of the natural course of AWS. NSAIDs were prescribed, but their use was not monitored. Also, patients were not told to perform or not perform exercises on their own. Perhaps the patients with lymphedema were performing more exercises.

Nursing Implications

Nurses need to vigilantly monitor for symptoms of pain in the ipsilateral limbs of patients with breast cancer to prevent loss of function, chronic pain, and lymphedema. As seen in this study, even pain at level 3 is significant. Patients need early PT referral to prevent arm disability and early lymphedema therapy.

Print

Chow, E., Meyer, R.M., Ding, K., Nabid, A., Chabot, P., Wong, P., . . . Wong, R.K. (2015). Dexamethasone in the prophylaxis of radiation-induced pain flare after palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases: A double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncology, 16, 1463–1472. 

Study Purpose

To compare the efficacy of dexamethasone to placebo for prevention of pain flare after palliative radiotherapy

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process

Patients were randomized to receive either 8 mg dexamethasone or placebo at least one hour before the start of radiotherapy and then daily while receiving radiotherapy. Patients completed study assessments at baseline, day 10, and day 42 after radiation treatment.

Sample Characteristics

  • N = 298   
  • MEDIAN AGE = 69 years
  • AGE RANGE = 58–77 years
  • MALES: 57%, FEMALES: 43%
  • CURRENT TREATMENT: Radiation
  • KEY DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Multiple tumor types—breast, prostate, and lung were predominant. Single dose of 8 Gy was used to target volumes planned.
  • OTHER KEY SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS: Of the patients, 50% had worst pain at baseline between 7–10 on the numeric scale.

Setting

  • SITE: Multi-site   
  • SETTING TYPE: Multiple settings    
  • LOCATION: Canada

Phase of Care and Clinical Applications

  • PHASE OF CARE: Late effects and survivorship
  • APPLICATIONS: Elder care, palliative care 

Study Design

  • Double-blind, placebo-controlled

Measurement Instruments/Methods

  • Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)
  • Daily pain diary with numeric scale
  • EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL for palliative, EORTC QLQ-C30 for quality of life, and EORTC QLQ-BM22 for bone metastases
  • Dexamethasone Symptom Questionnaire (DSQ)

Results

Median follow-up ranged from 1-39 months. Ninety-two patients experienced pain flare on days 0–10, 26% in the dexamethasone group and 35% in the placebo group (p = 0.05). The incidence of pain flare was 11.8% lower in the dexamethasone group (p = 0.01). No significant differences were noted between groups in overall pain reduction from radiotherapy or analgesic intake. Three patients on dexamethasone stopped the study medication due to hyperglycemic events. Two of these had preexisting diabetes.

Conclusions

Provision of 8 mg dexamethasone prior to and daily during palliative radiation therapy for bone metastases was effective in the prevention of radiation-associated pain flare compared to placebo.

Limitations

  • High variability in follow-up measurement time frames

Nursing Implications

This study showed that administration of dexamethasone during palliative radiation therapy for bone metastases was effective in preventing bone flare pain. A few patients developed hyperglycemic episodes while on dexamethasone, so nurses need to be aware of this potential, particularly in patients with preexisting diabetes. The purpose of palliative radiation is pain reduction, so it also makes sense to intervene to prevent pain flare that can occur from that treatment. Further research is warranted to compare prophylactic versus treatment of bone flare pain, and potential efficacy of other adjuvant medications.

Print

Chow, E., van der Linden, Y.M., Roos, D., Hartsell, W.F., Hoskin, P., Wu, J.S., . . . Wong, R.K. (2014). Single versus multiple fractions of repeat radiation for painful bone metastases: A randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. The Lancet Oncology, 15, 164–171. 

Study Purpose

To assess two different radiation therapy fractionation approaches in patients with painful bone metastases needing repeat radiation therapy

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process

Patients with radiologically confirmed bone metastases that had previously been treated with radiation were randomized to receive 8 Gy in a single fraction or 20 Gy in multiple fractions. Those getting 20 Gy received treatment in five fractions unless the target field was the spine or whole pelvis. Bone-modifying agents and systemic therapy were allowed at the discretion of the physician. Overall response to treatment was the primary endpoint at two months after beginning treatment. Pain assessments were done at days 7 and 14, monthly for 6 months, and at 9 and 12 months after radiation therapy. A difference of 10% with treatment response was established to determine noninferiority.

Sample Characteristics

  • N = 521 per protocol (850 in intention-to-treat [ITT] analysis)
  • MEAN AGE = 65 years
  • MALES: 58.7%, FEMALES: 41.3%
  • KEY DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Prostate, breast, and lung were the most frequent diagnoses. Other cancer types were included. 
  • OTHER KEY SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS: Average worst pain at baseline was 7–10. Baseline average morphine equivalent daily dose was 40–47.5 in the 20 Gy and 8 Gy groups, respectively.

Setting

  • SITE: Multi-site  
  • SETTING TYPE: Outpatient  
  • LOCATION: International

Phase of Care and Clinical Applications

  • PHASE OF CARE: Late-effects, survivorship
  • APPLICATIONS: Palliative care

Study Design

Unblinded, randomized, controlled noninferiority trial

Measurement Instruments/Methods

  • Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)
  • Complete response was defined as a worst pain score of 0 with no increase in daily morphine equivalent.
  • Partial response was defined as pain with either a worst pain score reduction of at least two points and no increase in daily morphine equivalents or no increase in pain with a reduction of daily opioid consumption by at least 25%.
  • Pain progression was defined as either an increase in worst pain score by two or more points with no change in opioid consumption or no change in worst pain score with increased opioid consumption.

Results

In the ITT analysis, 28% in the 8 Gy group had response, and 32% of those in the 20 Gy group had overall response with a confidence interval that did not meet the noninferiority margin. In the per-protocol analysis, 45% of patients in the 8 Gy group and 51% in the 20 Gy group had overall response with a 95% confidence interval that met the 10% noninferiority margin. Patients in the 20 Gy group had more skin reddening and more frequent and severe anorexia, vomiting, and diarrhea (p < .05).

Conclusions

The per-protocol analysis showed that multiple fractionation was associated with slightly better pain response to treatment, but was also associated with more side effects.

Limitations

  • Unintended interventions or applicable interventions not described that would influence results
  • Other limitations/explanation: Differences in use of bone-modifying agents are not reported in this manuscript. This study reports overall pain response but not complete or partial response data.

Nursing Implications

Radiation therapy to areas of painful bone metastases is effective in reducing pain. Though a higher total dose was slightly more effective, it was also associated with more side effects. Nurses can use this knowledge to educate patients and to monitor appropriate patients for treatment side effects.

Print

Chow, R., Chiu, L., Navari, R., Passik, S., Chiu, N., Popovic, M., . . . DeAngelis, C. (2015). Efficacy and safety of olanzapine for the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) as reported in phase I and II studies: A systematic review. Supportive Care in Cancer, 24, 1001–1008. 

Purpose

STUDY PURPOSE: To summarize evidence from phase I and II trials in which olanzapine was used for the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV)

TYPE OF STUDY: Systematic review

Search Strategy

DATABASES USED: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Collaboration
 
KEYWORDS: Nausea and vomiting, vomiting and chemotherapy, nausea and chemotherapy, and olanzapine and CINV
 
INCLUSION CRITERIA: Phase I and II trials reporting on use of olanzapine for CINV reporting on CINV outcomes; single-arm uncontrolled trials 
 
EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Not specified

Literature Evaluated

TOTAL REFERENCES RETRIEVED: 356
 
EVALUATION METHOD AND COMMENTS ON LITERATURE USED: No quality evaluation was described

Sample Characteristics

  • FINAL NUMBER STUDIES INCLUDED = 7 
  • TOTAL PATIENTS INCLUDED IN REVIEW = 201
  • SAMPLE RANGE ACROSS STUDIES: 3–40 patients
  • KEY SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS: Multiple tumor types across studies; highly and moderately emetogenic chemotherapy regimens

Phase of Care and Clinical Applications

PHASE OF CARE: Active antitumor treatment

Results

The rate of complete control (no emesis, no rescue medication, and no significant nausea) was only identified in one study. Complete response rates were reported in three studies, and they ranged from 75%–100% in the acute phase and 72%–92.5% in the overall phase. In four trials, olanzapine was used as an adjunct with other antiemetics. One study was a retrospective chart review.

Conclusions

The findings of this study suggest that olanzapine can be beneficial in preventing CINV.

Limitations

  • The sample sizes of the studies were small.
  • No information was provided regarding the use of any other antiemetics. 
  • How a study using a retrospective chart review constitutes as a phase I or II study for inclusion was unclear.

Nursing Implications

The potential role of olanzapine in the prevention and management of CINV is unclear. This review provides limited evidence of the effects of olanzapine for CINV. Future studies need to compare olanzapine as an adjuvant to recommended antiemetics or olanzapine as a single agent compared to regimens with clear efficacy for the prevention of CINV.

Print
Subscribe to